Friday, June 27, 2014

We're Number Two! We're Number Two!

The final first round games were full of drama, if not high quality soccer.  Taken as a whole, the reviews around the soccer blogosphere for the first round are very high.  And the second round matches look excellent too.

We Won Drew Didn't Lose by Three Four Goals

Was there a more gut wrenching 40 minutes than the time between Muller's goal and the final whistle of the Portugal-Ghana match?  With US down 0-1 and the other matched tied at 1-1, I confess to thinking the worst - we're not going to score, Ghana will and the US are going home.  Though it seemed weird to be so happy about the second Portuguese goal, the US earned the upper hand with better performances in the first two matches.  As I'll discuss more below, it's no different than two NFL teams entering the final week of the season with one holding an advantage if they finish with the same record because of a better conference record.


The question for me is, despite the fact that they advanced, were the long stretches of seemingly poor play really poor or a function of the competition?  Yes they beat Ghana but were outplayed by them for about 80 minutes.  And there were only traces of offensive pressure against the Germans and they spent the entire match on their heels.  On the other hand, Germany could only manage one goal against the US and Ghana got a draw against Germany when the group was still up for grabs.  So maybe this really was a tough group.

I ask because the important thing for me about this World Cup is less about how far we go and more about whether Klinsmann is taking the program to a new level.  A competitive showing, win or lose, versus Belgium would be a clear sign.

Is it possible that the group's standings turned on the Pepe red card for his soft head butt of Muller?  The score was 2-0 at the time but with the man advantage, Germany added two more.  The US differential was three better than Portugal but you can speculate how the things might have played out differently with a less lopsided result in that first match.  Speaking of Muller, who's getting tired of his thespian activities?  DeMarcus Beasley is; he risked a yellow card kicking the ball after another phantom foul occasioned by a Muller dive.


Three is the Loneliest Number

There were tense moments in the other seven groups as well, though it wasn't necessarily the best soccer of the tournament so far.  Four of the 16 matches were affected by straight red cards.  There was magic from Messi, an offensive explosion from Mexico and the ugliness of Uruguay-Italy (39 fouls, the winning "header" was off Godin's back, and Luis Overbite's indiscretion).  For last second heroics/tragedy, the Greece - Ivory Coast match takes the prize.  The Ivorians, needing only a draw, had evened the match up in the 74 minute and were seconds away from advancing when Georgios Samaras was fouled in the box; he converted the PK and Greece took second in the group.

Some random numbers.  Four teams won all three first round matches - Netherlands, Columbia, Argentina and Belgium.  The Dutch had the most goals - 10.  Greece was the only team with a negative goal differential to advance (just 2 scored, 4 allowed).  Ecuador and Portugal were the only sides with four or more points not to advance.  "Last" place in the tournament looks to be Cameroon's - no points and a negative 8 goal differential, narrowly edging out pointless Honduras (-7 goal differential) and Australia (-6 goal differential).



Mini Rant

How often have you heard the complaint that soccer is boring, nothing ever happens?  No, the person doesn't know what he's looking at.  A short pass out to the wing to create a run down the side line?  How is that different from the quarterback dumping a pass to the halfback out in the flat and watching him run?  Or how about, the rules are complicated, I like baseball, three strikes and you're out.  Ask that person, what happens if the catcher drops the third strike?  What happens if the catcher drops the third strike and there's a man on first?  What happens if the catcher drops the third strike and there's a man on first but there's two outs?  Nothing more puzzling to me than to listen to someone who can recite to the letter how the NFL tiebreaker rules work for determining the wild card playoff spots but throws his hands up, declaring soccer tiebreaker rules are just too confusing.  I would say that in general there's less outright hostility towards the sport than there used to be (yeah, I read Ann Coulter's recent screech but she'll say anything to get a rise out of people) but I still think many are still too willing to find excuses not to get interested.


Interlude

When I played soccer I was often compared to Italian striker Ciro Immobile.  Honest.  I can't tell you how many times people said "It's like you're immobile out there."


Round Two Viewing Guide

Eight games in four days, one at noon and one at four pm. We have South American Saturday with
Brazil-Chile and Columbia-Uruguay.  Sunday is Netherlands - Mexico and Greece - Costa Rica. Decent odds for Los Ticos; if they should advance, motorists in Northwest Philadelphia are advised to be sure not to hit the tall, silver-haired man dancing in the streets.  Action continues Monday with France - Nigeria and Argentina - Switzerland, then concludes on Tuesday with Germany - Algeria and Belgium - US.

Viewing recommendations: Watch them all

I couldn't find Nate Silver's soccer model right before the cup started but have since located several articles. This one includes percent chance of advancing through the rounds for each of the remaining teams in the tournament.  Note that this model gives the US a better chance than most of the underdogs in the second round.  Brazil's favorable odds are predicated on modeling which suggests a huge home field advantage, larger than in any other sport.  If you click on the link "our model," you can read details on how it works and their projections for the group stage. 


48 down, 15 to go.

4 comments:

  1. Wow. So lucky. Like Landon Donovan said, everything depends on context...if we didn't get the result we needed in the Portugal-Ghana game, everyone would be saying this tournament was a failure, but instead, people are saying things like "we deserved to go through" and "in Jurgen we trust". Unbelievable. The margins in this game are so small. The team did struggle a bit against Germany and had almost nothing going forward...but what do you expect when you play guys like Beckerman and Zusi? If only we had players like Donovan and Eddie Johnson (direct replacement for Altidore) on the team...

    I would like to see Cameron at right back next game (where he plays in the EPL) and Fabian Johnson advanced to right midfield...but I know JK won't do it.

    Tie breaker rules are stupid...how can goals scored (and goal differential) be ahead of head to head?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I disagree that the tournament would have been a failure with an exit in the group stage. It would have been disappointing for sure, but how many of us knew there was a reasonably chance the US weren't advancing as soon as we saw our group? Before the tournament, I felt that going 1-1-1 would be a good accomplishment and it would be a bonus if that were enough to advance. We did need a few breaks to advance, but that can be said for almost any sports tournament or regular season. We were also only one tired play from Cameron (not covering Varela) away from easily advancing. As for the tiebreakers, I think the point is to let the team with overall better group performance advance rather than the winner of one game. If head-to-head record were supposed to be the most important thing, the whole tournament would be a 32 team knockout bracket.

    On the personnel side, I don't claim to know why Klinsmann picked the squad he did, but don't we owe him at least a chance to do things his way? His choices might seem odd from the outside, but he has the insider knowledge that we do not. I am not saying I don't appreciate what Landon has done for US soccer, but he was definitely not going to be on the next USMNT that wins the World Cup. And one of the most frustrating things in sports is rewarding players for past performance when their current abilities hurt the team's chances to win (*cough* Ryan Howard *cough*).

    And as for Cameron, he got burned twice in the Portugal game leading to Gonzalez starting against Germany. Gonzalez turned in an overall excellent performance which might get him the nod on Tuesday.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No ready to nominate Klinsmann for US Soccer Hall of Fame but on balance his decisions have been validated. Howard was a no-brainer. His faith in Beasley was well-founded and shows that Jurgen is not simply blinded by youth born on air bases in Germany. He stood with Jones when the rest of us (yeah I'm looking at me) were less than impressed. Would the US be advancing without his performances? Probably not. Besler and Johnson are fine. Don't think it's fair to pick on Beckerman - his work has been acceptable. Dempsey's fine. Bedoya/Davis have been a bit disappointing but not sure what the options were there.

      I'd say there are maybe three areas of possible criticism. Zusi's crossing has been less than satisfactory, especially the corners - although he did get the assist on Dempsey's goal. Donovan might have been a better choice but would we be stuck with one less sub per match knowing he couldn't go the distance. Playing Cameron at center back didn't work against Portugal. But Gonzalez was shaky before the tournament. Maybe Goodson was the better choice. Except Cameron has mostly done well in the role and it's not like he has no clue at the position. Lastly, there was no replacement for Altidore when he went down. But was there a roster choice to deal with that possibility? Enigmatic Eddie Johnson is the only possibility and his consistency is suspect. Might have worked but maybe not.

      But on balance, the US went through. Sure it was close in the end, though not as close as last time, when we needed a goal in stoppage time against Algeria. After Ronaldo scored, we had a two goal cushion any way you looked at it. The US were better than Ghana and didn't get hammered by Germany the way Portugal did and had the run of play for much of the Portugal match. The "if game" plays out in other ways too. If the ball in the corner hadn't gone off Yedlin (who did exactly what he was supposed to do in taking the ball into the corner with time running down), it would have been US throw-in and the second Portugal goal never happens.

      My point is, though I don't agree with all Klinsmann's choices, he seems to have gotten a lot of them right, including some I didn't agree with at the time. He's earned another four years in my mind.

      Delete
    2. I agree, that the USA wasn't necessarily a sure thing to advance from the group, but rarely are American expectations based on reality. We are ranked (in the bogus FIFA rankings) in the top 16 in the world, and reaching the knock-out stage is what I consider to be our "level". Anything beyond that would be a bonus, in my mind. I would be thrilled if we are able to take Belgium to penalties and roll the dice there. I do understand the argument that the tie-breaker are theoretically supposed to reward the team with the better overall group performance, but is it really fair to say that a 2-1 loss is better than a 1-0 loss (if it was to come down to goals scored)? I think that is significantly more arbitrary than selecting the winner of a head-to-head matchup. It also promotes teams trying to lose by less goals, for example, potentially the USA parking the bus in front of the goal when trailing Germany 1-0 to keep to goal differential down instead of actually trying to earn a result like Portugal did (and getting punished for it). Speaking of this, there is absolutely no reason the USA shouldn't have pushed for the equalizer when they were trailing Germany 1-0 and the Ghana-Portugal game was tied. There was absolutely no reason not to throw caution to the wind and try to get a result (in case Ghana scored again, which was at least 1000x more likely than Portugal making up goal differential)!!!! How are people not absolutely outraged about that coaching move, we were losing our minds at my viewing party...there was absolutely no downside.

      I think the most frustrating thing in sports is not rewarding players for past performance, but holding personal vendettas and not selecting players on the merit of their performances. JK used guys like Landon, EJ, and Goodson (in addition to Parkhurst and Evans) ALL THE TIME in World Cup Qualifying, then sends them home for the big dance? Their performances, at least the first 3, earned them a spot on the team (and likely significant minutes) in my mind. Landon Donovan is not holding the team back from winning the World Cup. As the Galaxy fans held up a sign upon his return "If we have 23 players better than Donovan, we have a chance to win the world cup". And I agree, the moment Donovan was sent home, my criteria for judging JK became that we must win the World Cup. And Donovan can absolutely go 90 minutes at a high level, just not practice. And we could always use him off the bench if he really couldn't go 90 (which I doubt).

      I agree Gonzalez will start again at CB and I am fine with that, I am just saying Cameron can play RB where he is more comfortable and then move Johnson up to the right side of midfield, where as Steve said, we don't really have options beyond Bedoya, Zusi, and Davis (if Green isn't ready, why is he here?).

      I'm not picking as much on Beckerman (and other players) for trying their best and being exactly who they are, as much as I am picking on the roster and line-up selections. I just think JK has gotten a ton of undue credit, when in reality, many of his choices have been suspect.

      Delete