"Megan Rapinoe has to be higher up the field. She's no good to us getting the ball at the center line."
"Did you see how quickly the Swedish defenders re-formed a straight back line as soon as the ball was cleared?"
"We're too crowded on this side of the field."
are interspersed with observations such as these:
"Look at Sydney Leroux's foundation! 75 minutes into the match and her make-up is still perfect"
"I don't understand why more women don't put their hair in a bun. The pigtails just flop around and slap you in the face."
"She needs a new sports bra."
Plus there were these interchanges.
Mackenzie: That Swedish player is a bully.
Me: Which one?
Mackenzie: The tall, blonde one.
Me: Okay, that narrows it down.
Me: Did you see Hope Solo punch that ball?
Mackenzie: Too soon.
But let me warn you. Don't get her started on the issue of the tournament being played on artificial turf instead of grass. "Stupid, sexist FIFA" is the only part of her tirade that I can print here. And, of course, you know she's right. There is no chance - NONE - that a major men's tournament would be played on anything but grass. The "official" reason is that it's hard to grow grass in Canada's climate. Probably true. But I've seen temporary sod put down over turf; not ideal but still better than playing on plastic carpet. My understanding is that there was a firm willing to do just that for free so the cost couldn't be the real problem. Just another example of FIFA's incompetence.
Form Basically Holds in the Group Stage
Despite some lackluster play by the favorites and some upsets, the final standings in the group stage aren't that far off what either FIFA or fivethirtyeight rankings would have suggested. France lost to Colombia but still won their group; Germany could only manage a draw against the Netherlands but also still won their group. Spain wasn't a clear choice to advance but they probably weren't expected to crash and burn with a last place finish and just one point. Sweden failed to win a match, finished third and gets Germany in the Round of 16.
And the US? Despite two wins and a draw, they really haven't looked all that solid yet. Yes it was a tough group but they will have to beat better teams to win the tournament. The back line and Hope Solo have played well, as has Rapinoe; but Lloyd and Holiday have struggled in the midfield. The Yanks will face Colombia in the round of 16 (on Monday), then hopefully the winner of China-Cameroon.
As Chris K pointed out in the comments last week, the creation of the groups is different for the women. Grant Wahl noted that "FIFA feels like it needs to put certain teams in certain cities to sell tickets and in certain time zones to help with TV ratings back home." That process has resulted in the top three teams (Germany, USA and France) ending up on one side of the bracket which means things like Germany and France will probably face in the quarterfinals and US and Germany could face each other in the semis. I guess it doesn't matter whether you have to beat the best team in the semis or the finals but it still sounds like another example of FIFA dissing the women's game. Shhh, don't let Mackenzie know.
Don't Argue with the Referee (or the AR) Part I
The Croatia-Italy European qualifier would have been notable if only because Croatia was forced to host the match in an empty stadium because of fan misbehavior at an earlier contest. Add to that, somehow a swastika had been cut into the field. But my reason for mentioning this match was what happened to the Italians when they argued an offside call with the AR. Seen here, the Croatians immediately restarted play, moved the ball quickly down field and scored. Replays suggest the AR probably got the call wrong but you'll get no sympathy here.
Don't Argue with the Referee Part II

Hey Mackenzie, how was my rant?
Speaking of the US Open Cup, the Union eked out a win in their match, beating a lower division side in a shoot-out. That suggests a performance more like the loss to NYCFC than the string of good outings against New England and DC United. They return to MLS action on Saturday night with a trip to LA, which is not a good place for them to find their mojo.
It appears that the email notification function is not working again. We plan to post throughout the summer so even if you don't hear from us, check in occasionally to see what's up. In the meantime, we have top people working on the problem.
Dempsey's actions were bad--but I don't think "destructing the referee's personal property is tantamount to referee assault" as has been suggested. Yes, his actions were unprofessional and the suspension is fair...but it was a mostly harmless way to express his discontent. And his discontent was warranted, the refereeing was awful. Two of the previous red cards were awarded on plays that I'm not sure should have even been fouls. Still odd to see a professional team end with 7 players.
ReplyDeleteUSSF determined it was "abuse" not "assault" and gave Dempsey a three game suspension. While a strict read of the rules would say it was an assault (the notebook being part of the referee's equipment) one can argue that this interpretation was closer to the spirit of the rules. It sounds like his discontent may well have been warranted but the behavior was out of bounds.
Delete